cultural agility

Cultural agility is a term employed in talent management to design a complex competency based on skills whose command allows an individual or an organization to perform successfully in cross-cultural situations. The concept appears to overlap with others such as cross-cultural competence and cultural intelligence. The subject has been linked to studying abroad, foreign talent acquisition, immigrants and refugees, career success, sports coaching, leadership development, and global business. On psychological aspects, the command of cultural agility resources may be facilitated by personality traits like extraversion, openness, and predisposition to novelty seeking, but also by appropriate learning. Self-assessment has been pointed out as a practical approach to evaluate the level of competence reached by cultural agility trainees.

History

Apart from its colloquial use, the term ''agility'' was proposed as a relevant concept to industry and business management in the 1990s by Steven L. Goldman, who published a volume on the subject. An early use of the full term (cultural agility) is found in a in a series of conferences by Terry Lee named "Leadership for the New Millennium", in 1999. Since then, the concept has been amply developed by Paula Caligiuri and coworkers from Northeastern University, through many academic articles and books, and is now widely used in academic literature. Other authors publishing books on agility as a main subject include Peter Gillies from TIAS School for Business and Society ( Tilburg, Netherlands), and Guy Morrow, from the University of Melbourne, Australia.

Beyond academic circles, the term has gained popularity in mass media when commenting about the need for acquisition of intercultural skills to achieve adequate inclusion in the socioeconomic workings of an increasingly globalized world. A Cultural Agility Collaboration Group has been established by the University of Minnesota to facilitate developing ''inclusive, equitable, socially just spaces'' in campuses, and local communities.

Digitalization

Digital technologies facilitate communication across cultures, and help overcome language barriers to some extent.

Localization

Although adapting business practices to local cultural preferences may seem generally appropriate, detailed assessment of circumstances may reveal overall benefits from the use of countercultural practices on some occasions.

Training

Opportunities to learn cultural agility theory and/or techniques appear to be growing through:

* Self-assessment, and e-learning.
* Organizational courses
* Inclussion of CA themes and courses in university syllabuses
* Ad-hoc programs for personnel sectors

Further reading

Reviews
*
Books
* Caligiuri, P. (2012). Cultural Agility: Building a Pipeline of Globally Successful Professionals. Jossey-Bass Publishing..
* Ferraro, G. P., & Briody, E. K. (2017). ''The cultural dimension of global business''. Taylor & Francis.
* Olivier, S., Hölscher, F., & Williams, C. (2020). ''Agile Leadership for Turbulent Times: Integrating Your Ego, Eco and Intuitive Intelligence''. Routledge.
*The Agile Culture Code: A guide to organizational agility (1st ed., 2020). BusinessVillage, .
* Caligiuri P. Building Your Cultural Agility: The Nine Competencies of Successful Global Professionals. Kogan-Page Publishing, (2021, in press),

References

{{Reflist, 30em

Human resource management
Cultural competence