HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
real analysis In mathematics, the branch of real analysis studies the behavior of real numbers, sequences and series of real numbers, and real functions. Some particular properties of real-valued sequences and functions that real analysis studies include con ...
, a branch of mathematics, Cousin's theorem states that: :If for every point of a closed region (in modern terms, " closed and bounded") there is a circle of finite radius (in modern term, a " neighborhood"), then the region can be divided into a finite number of subregions such that each subregion is interior to a circle of a given set having its center in the subregion.Hildebrandt 1925, p. 29 This result was originally proved by Pierre Cousin, a student of
Henri Poincaré Jules Henri Poincaré ( S: stress final syllable ; 29 April 1854 – 17 July 1912) was a French mathematician, theoretical physicist, engineer, and philosopher of science. He is often described as a polymath, and in mathematics as "The ...
, in 1895, and it extends the original Heine–Borel theorem on
compactness In mathematics, specifically general topology, compactness is a property that seeks to generalize the notion of a closed and bounded subset of Euclidean space by making precise the idea of a space having no "punctures" or "missing endpoints", i ...
for arbitrary covers of
compact Compact as used in politics may refer broadly to a pact or treaty; in more specific cases it may refer to: * Interstate compact * Blood compact, an ancient ritual of the Philippines * Compact government, a type of colonial rule utilized in British ...
subsets of \mathbb^n. However, Pierre Cousin did not receive any credit. Cousin's theorem was generally attributed to
Henri Lebesgue Henri Léon Lebesgue (; June 28, 1875 – July 26, 1941) was a French mathematician known for his theory of integration, which was a generalization of the 17th-century concept of integration—summing the area between an axis and the curve of ...
as the Borel–Lebesgue theorem. Lebesgue was aware of this result in 1898, and proved it in his 1903 dissertation. In modern terms, it is stated as: :Let \mathcal be a full cover of 'a'', ''b'' that is, a collection of closed subintervals of 'a'', ''b''with the property that for every ''x'' ∈ 'a'', ''b'' there exists a ''δ''>0 so that \mathcal contains all subintervals of 'a'', ''b''which contains ''x'' and length smaller than ''δ''. Then there exists a partition of non-overlapping intervals for 'a'', ''b'' where I_i = _, x_i\in \mathcal and ''a''=''x''0 < ''x''1 < ⋯ < ''x''''n''=''b'' for all 1≤''i''≤''n''. Cousin's lemma is studied in
Reverse Mathematics Reverse mathematics is a program in mathematical logic that seeks to determine which axioms are required to prove theorems of mathematics. Its defining method can briefly be described as "going backwards from the theorems to the axioms", in cont ...
where it is one of the first third-order theorems that is hard to prove in terms of the comprehension axioms needed.


In Henstock–Kurzweil integration

Cousin's theorem is instrumental in the study of Henstock–Kurzweil integration, and in this context, it is known as Cousin's lemma or the fineness theorem. A ''gauge on'' ,b/math> is a strictly positive real-valued function \delta: ,b\to \R^+, while a ''tagged partition of ,b/math>'' is a finite sequence :P = \langle a = x_0 < t_1 < x_1 < t_2 < \cdots < x_ < t_ < x_\ell = b \rangle Given a gauge \delta: ,b\to \R^+ and a tagged partition P of ,b/math>, we say P is ''\delta-fine'' if for all 1 \leq j \leq \ell, we have (x_,x_) \subseteq B \big( t_j,\delta(t_j) \big), where B(x, r) denotes the
open ball In mathematics, a ball is the solid figure bounded by a ''sphere''; it is also called a solid sphere. It may be a closed ball (including the boundary points that constitute the sphere) or an open ball (excluding them). These concepts are def ...
of radius r centred at x. Cousin's lemma is now stated as: :If a, then every gauge \delta: ,b\to \mathbb^+ has a ''\delta-fine'' partition.Bartle 2001, p. 11


Proof of the theorem

Cousin's theorem has an
intuitionistic In the philosophy of mathematics, intuitionism, or neointuitionism (opposed to preintuitionism), is an approach where mathematics is considered to be purely the result of the constructive mental activity of humans rather than the discovery of ...
proof using the open induction principle, which reads as follows: An open subset S of a closed real interval ,b/math> is said to be inductive if it satisfies that ,r) \subset S implies [a,r\subset S. Completeness_of_the_real_numbers#The_open_induction_principle">The open induction principle states that any inductive subset S of ,b/math> must be the entire set.


Proof using open induction

Let S be the set of points r such that there exists a \delta-fine tagged partition on [a,s] for some s \geq r. The set S is open, since it is downwards closed and any point in it is included in the open ray ,b\cap [a,t_n + \delta(t_n) ) \subset S for any associated partition. Furthermore, it is inductive. For any r, suppose [a,r) \subset S. By that assumption (and using that either r > a or r \in [a, a + \delta(a)) \subset S to handle edge cases) we have a partition of length n with x_n > \mathrm(a,r - \tfrac \delta(r)). Then either x_n > b - (t_n + \delta(t_n) - x_n) or x_n < b. In the first case b < t_n + \delta(t_n), so we can just replace x_n with b and get a partition of ,b/math> that includes r. If x_n < b, we may form a partition of length n+1 that includes r. To show this, we split into the cases r > x_n or r < x_n + \delta(x_n). In the first case, we set t_ = r, in the second we set t_ = x_n. In both cases, we can set x_ = \mathrm(b, t_ + \tfrac\delta(t_)) > x_n and obtain a valid partition. So [a,r] \subset S in all cases, and S is inductive. By open induction, S = ,b/math>.


Notes


References

*Hildebrandt, T. H. (1925). ''The Borel Theorem and its Generalizations'' In J. C. Abbott (Ed.), The Chauvenet Papers: A collection of Prize-Winning Expository Papers in Mathematics. Mathematical Association of America. *Raman, M. J. (1997). ''Understanding Compactness: A Historical Perspective'', Master of Arts Thesis. University of California, Berkeley. . *Bartle, R. G. (2001). ''A Modern Theory of Integration'', Graduate Studies in Mathematics 32, American Mathematical Society. {{mathanalysis-stub Real analysis