Etymology
Most scholars believe that the word is a metathesis of the Arabic-origin word ''khabar'' ("information"). S N Joshi argues that the word is derived from the Persian word ''khair'' or ''bakhair'' ("all is well", the end salutation in a letter), since it appears at the end of most texts. Bapuji Sankpal argued that the word is derived from the Sanskrit-origin word ''akhyayika'' ("story") or it could be bhyaakh ( bhiyakhya) .Style
The principal characteristics of are that they were written in prose, had a forceful style of writing, were of political historical nature which appealed to Maratha patriotism, were often commissioned by a patron, displayed an acceptance of tradition and also a belief in the supernatural. Early were sparsely written and contained a number of words of Persian derivation, later works tended to be voluminous and contained Sanskritised prose.History
The earliest dates associated with a are 1448 or 1455, by different authors, being considered as the year that the prose part of "Mahikavatichi Bakhar", comprising the second and third chapters, was written by Keshavacharya. The , which is the compilation of three authors of the 15th and 16th centuries - Bhagwan, Datta and Keshavacharya - is significant as the earliest attempt at uniting the Marathi-speaking populace against oppressive Bahmani rule. There are around 200 known , fifty or so of which are considered to be notable, while some others have not been published at all. All the except for the early works, such as '' Sabhasad Bakhar'', '' 91 Kalmi Bakhar'' and the '' Ajnyapatra Bakhar'' besides others, are considered to be written between 1760 and 1850 during the heyday of theList of
Some of the include:Reliability
Most historians have long neglected as unreliable, due to their colourful literary style with elements of Marathi, Sanskrit aphorisms and Persian administrative jargon. However, are recently being investigated for their historical content. James Grant Duff relied on in the making of his "History of the Marathas". Shankar Gopal Tulpule described the as a reliable source of history, while the Indian nationalist historian Vishwanath Kashinath Rajwade (1864–1926) described them as "full of meaningless verbosity" and "fragmented, contradictory, vague and unreliable". Jadunath Sarkar (1870–1958) also described them as "collections of gossip and tradition, sometimes no better than opium-eaters' tales".References
{{reflist Maratha Empire Literary genres Historiography of India