Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) is a semantic representation language. AMR graphs are rooted, labeled, directed, acyclic graphs ( DAGs), comprising whole sentences. They are intended to abstract away from syntactic representations, in the sense that sentences which are similar in meaning should be assigned the same AMR, even if they are not identically worded. By nature, the AMR language is biased towards English – it is not meant to function as an international auxiliary language. Abstract Meaning Representations have originally been introduced by Langkilde and Knight (1998) as a derivation from the Penman Sentence Plan Language, they are thus continuing a long tradition in

Natural Language Generation Natural language generation (NLG) is a software process that produces natural language output. In one of the most widely-cited survey of NLG methods, NLG is characterized as "the subfield of artificial intelligence and computational linguistics th ...

and this has been their original domain of application. AMRs have re-gained attention since Banarescu et al. (2013), in particular, this includes the extension to novel tasks such as machine translation and natural language understanding. The modern (post-2010) AMR format preserves the syntax and many syntactic conceptions of the original AMR format but has been thoroughly revised to better align with

PropBank PropBank is a corpus that is annotated with verbal propositions and their arguments—a "proposition bank". Although "PropBank" refers to a specific corpus produced by Martha Palmer ''et al.'', the term ''propbank'' is also coming to be used a ...

. Moreover, AMR has been extended with formal conventions for metadata and conventions for entity linking (here, linking with Wikipedia entries). Existing AMR technology includes tools and libraries for parsing, visualization, and surface generation as well as a considerable number of publicly available data sets. Many of these resources are collected at the AMR homepage at ISI/USC where AMR technology has been originally developed.

Example

Example sentence: ''The boy wants to go.'' (w / want-01 :arg0 (b / boy) :arg1 (g / go-01 :arg0 b)) As far as predicate semantics are concerned, the role inventory of PropBank is largely based on semantic role annotations in the style of PropBank. Note that in pre-2010 AMR format, `:arg0` would be `:agent`, etc. Banarescu et al. (2013) claim that this is equivalent to the following logical formula:

\exist w, b, g: 
instance(w, want\_01) \wedge instance(g, go\_01) \wedge
instance(b, boy) \wedge arg0(w, b) \wedge
arg1(w, g) \wedge arg0(g, b)

In addition, they claim that this representation makes the will of the boy more explicit, highlighting that the intention of the boy is that he himself goes away (because `want-01` is the type of the top-level predicate).

References

Semantics {{semantics-stub