Allomorph

In linguistics, an allomorph is a variant phonetic form of a morpheme, or in other words, a unit of meaning that varies in sound and spelling without changing the meaning. The term ''allomorph'' describes the realization of phonological variations for a specific morpheme. The different allomorphs that a morpheme can become are governed by morphophonemic rules. These phonological rules determine what phonetic form, or specific pronunciation, a morpheme will take based on the phonological or morphological context in which it appears.

Allomorphy in English involves the variation of morphemes in their phonetic form based on specific linguistic contexts, a phenomenon governed by morphophonemic rules. For instance, the past tense morpheme "-ed" can manifest in different forms— É™d t or d€”depending on the final sound of the verb stem. This variability is not random but follows predictable patterns, such as the insertion of a schwa ™or assimilation to the voicing of the preceding consonant. Similarly, English plural morphemes exhibit three allomorphs: s z and É™z with pronunciation determined by the final sound of the noun, whether it be a voiceless consonant, a voiced consonant, or a sibilant. In addition, negative prefixes like "in-" display allomorphy, changing from ªn-to ªÅ‹-or ªm-depending on the following consonant's place of articulation. This systematic variation reflects the intricate relationship between phonology and morphology in language, with allomorph selection being guided by both phonological environment and morphological constraints (Pak, 2016; Stanton, 2022).

In English

English has several morphemes that vary in sound but not in meaning, such as past tense morphemes, plural morphemes, and negative morphemes.

Past tense allomorphs

For example, an English past tense morpheme is ''-ed'', which occurs in several allomorphs depending on its phonological environment by assimilating the voicing of the previous segment or the insertion of a schwa after an alveolar stop. A possible set of assimilations is:

* as or in verbs whose stem ends with the alveolar stops or , such as 'hunted' or 'banded'
* as in verbs whose stem ends with voiceless phonemes other than , such as 'fished'
* as in verbs whose stem ends with voiced phonemes other than , such as 'buzzed'

The "other than" restrictions above are typical for allomorphy. If the allomorphy conditions are ordered from most restrictive (in this case, after an alveolar stop) to least restrictive, the first matching case usually has precedence. Thus, the above conditions could be rewritten as follows:

* as or when the stem ends with the alveolar stops or
* as when the stem ends with voiceless phonemes
* as elsewhere

The allomorph does not appear after stem-final although the latter is voiceless, which is then explained by appearing in that environment, together with the fact that the environments are ordered (that is, listed in order of priority). Likewise, the allomorph does not appear after stem-final because the earlier clause for the allomorph has priority. The allomorph does not appear after stem-final voiceless phoneme because the preceding clause for the comes first.

Irregular past tense forms, such as "broke" or "was/were," can be seen as still more specific cases since they are confined to certain lexical items, such as the verb "break," which take priority over the general cases listed above.

Plural allomorphs

The plural morpheme for regular nouns in English is typically realized by adding an ''-s'' or ''-es'' to the end of the noun. However, the plural morpheme actually has three different allomorphs: s z and əz The specific pronunciation that a plural morpheme takes on is determined by a set of morphological rules such as the following:

* assume that the basic form of the plural morpheme, /-z/, is z("bags" /bægz/)
* the morpheme /-z/ becomes É™zby inserting an ™before zwhen a noun ends in a sibilant ("buses" /bÊŒsÉ™z/)
* change the morpheme /-z/ to a voiceless swhen a noun ends in a voiceless sound ("caps" /kæps/)

Negative allomorphs

In English, the negative prefix ''in-'' has three allomorphs: ªn- ªÅ‹- and ªm- The phonetic form that the negative morpheme /ɪn-/ uses is determined by a set of morphological rules; for example:

* the negative morpheme /ɪn-/ becomes ªn-when preceding an alveolar consonant ("intolerant"/ɪnˈtÉ”lÉ™rÉ™nt/)
* the morpheme /ɪn-/ becomes ªÅ‹-before a velar consonant ("incongruous" /ɪŋˈkɔŋgruÉ™s/)
* the morpheme /ɪn-/ becomes ªm-before a bilabial consonant ("improper" /ɪmˈprÉ”pÉ™r/)

In Sámi languages

The Sámi languages have a trochaic pattern of alternating stressed and unstressed syllables. The vowels and consonants that are allowed in an unstressed syllable differ from those that are allowed in a stressed syllable. Consequently, every suffix and inflectional ending has two forms, and the form that is used depends on the stress pattern of the word to which it is attached. For example, Northern Sámi has the causative verb suffix - in which ''-'' is selected when it would be the third syllable (and the preceding verb has two syllables), and ''-'' is selected when it would be the third and the fourth syllables (and the preceding verb has three syllables):
* ' has two syllables and so when suffixed, the result is '.
* has three syllables and so when suffixed, the result is '.

The same applies to inflectional patterns in the Sami languages as well, which are divided into even stems and odd stems.

Stem allomorphy

Allomorphy can also exist in stems or roots, as in Classical Sanskrit:

There are three allomorphs of the stem, , , and , which are conditioned by the particular case-marking suffixes.

The form of the stem , found in the nominative singular and locative plural, is the etymological form of the morpheme. Pre-Indic palatalization of velars resulted in the variant form , which was initially phonologically conditioned. The conditioning can still be seen in the locative singular form, for which the is followed by the high front vowel .

However, the subsequent merging of and into made the alternation unpredictable on phonetic grounds in the genitive case (both singular and plural) as well as the nominative plural and the instrumental singular. Thus, allomorphy was no longer directly relatable to phonological processes.

Phonological conditioning also accounts for the form in the instrumental plural, in which the assimilates in voicing to the following .

History

The term was originally used to describe variations in chemical structure. It was first applied to language (in writing) in 1948, by Fatih Åžat and Sibel Merve in Language XXIV.Oxford English Dictionary Online: Entry 50006103. Accessed: 2006-09-05

See also

* Null allomorph
* Alternation (linguistics)
* Allophone
* Consonant mutation
* Grassmann's law
* Suppletion

References

{{Authority control

Linguistic morphology
Morphemes
Linguistics terminology