Forms
The wider category of A-not-A questions contains multiple distinct forms. These forms are differentiated on the basis of the location of the Negation constituent and the presence or absence of duplicate material.A-not-A form
This is the most atomic form of the A-not-A question, which contains two identical instances of the constituent A separated by negation.AB-not-AB form
This is a more complex form, containing two instances of the complex constituent AB separated by the negation. AB may represent an embedded clause, a subject joined with a prepositional phrase, or a verb phrase containing a DP.A-not-AB form
This form contains two unique constituents, A and AB, separated by the negation. A and AB are similar in that AB contains the entire content of A, but constituents are present in AB that are not present in A.AB-not-A form
This form is similar to the A-not-AB form, but the more complex constituent AB occurs before the negation.a-not-A form
This form is only found in instances where A is disyllabic constituent with initial syllable a, and the two constituents are separated by negation.a-not-AB form
This form is similar to the a-not-A form with a representing the initial syllable of A and the two separated by negation, but A is joined to another constituent to form the complex constituent AB.Similar forms in English
For the English question (1.a) "Are you happy or sad?", the response to this question must be an echo answer, stating either "I am happy," or the acceptable alternative, "I am sad". In other words, this sentence is aApproximations
Below are examples of English approximations of the A-not-A question. They are similar to the Sinitic A-not-A in that they present two possibilities and require an echoed response. However, they include an extra segment ("or" in the below examples) in order to read grammatically, which changes these approximations to an alternative question (AltQ) type. This extra segment is not seen in Sinitic A-not-A questions, and in fact the Mandarin segment ''haishi'' 'or' is used to contrast the syntax of the A-not-A form and demonstrate the latter's sensitivity toA-not-A form
(1) Was John at the party or not at the party?AB-not-A form
(2) Was John at the party last night or not at the party?A-not-AB form
(4) Was John at the party or not at the party last night?AB-not-AB form
(3) Was John at the party last night or not at the party last night?In Sinitic
NQ Morpheme
It is proposed that the A-not-A sequence is morpheme created by the reduplication of the interrogative morpheme (represented by the A in A-not-A). Though the specific syntactic location of this morpheme is not agreed upon, it is generally accepted that the A-not-A sequence is essentially a word formed by the concatenation of an abstract question morpheme and this duplicated predicate, which likens it to a VP-proclitic. This Morpheme is referred to as NQ in order to represent its character as negative and interrogative.Similarity to kam-type questions
An extensive cross-dialectic survey conducted in 1985 concluded that the Taiwanese question particle kam appears in the same contexts as the hypothesized Mandarin NQ. From this, it was concluded that kam-type questions and A-not-A questions are in complementary distribution: a language either has kam-type questions or A-not-A questions but not both. It was also interpreted that kam and NQ are "different morphological exponents of the same underlying morpheme".Movement, sensitivity, and parallels to weishenme 'why'
Unlike the yes/no question type formed using the segment "ma", the A-not-A question can be embedded, and may scope beyond its own clause. This scoping may be blocked if the original location of NQ and its intended final location are separated by anSensitivity to islands
The dominant view on A-not-A questions is that NQ is similar to a wh-word and related by the movement of NQ. This movement is not seen in alternative-type questions using ''haishi'' 'or', and therefore delineates A-not-A questions from alternative questions in terms of structure. Due to this syntactic differentiation, A-not-A questions may be contrasted with ''haishi'' questions for the purpose of revealing island sensitivity.Sinitic examples
The following are examples of A-not-A questions in languages belonging to the Sinitic linguistic family.In Mandarin
In forming A-not-A questions, A must remain the same on both sides. A is essentially a variable which can be replaced with a grammatical particle such as a modal, adverb, adjective, verb, or preposition.Patterns
In Mandarin, there are 6 attested patterns of A-not-A: A-not-A, AB-not-AB, A-not-AB, AB-not-A, a-not-A, and a-not-AB of which "A" stands for the full form of the predicate, "B" stands for the complement, and "a" stands for the first syllable of a disyllabic predicate.= A-not-A form
= Example (3) illustrates that A-not-A pattern, where A is the verb 'go', and is 'go not go'.= AB-not-AB form
= Example (4) illustrates the AB-not-AB pattern, where AB is the constituent consisting of the verb , 'know', as A, and the complement ', 'this CL man', as B, combining to form the AB constituent ' 'know this CL man'. This produces , 'know this CL man not know this CL man.'= A-not-AB form
= Example (5) illustrates the A-not-AB pattern, where A is the verb , 'know', AB is the constituent consisting of the A verb , 'know', and the complement , 'this CL man', as B, combining to form the AB constituent 'know this CL man'. This produces , 'know not know this CL man'.= AB-not-A form
= Example (6) illustrates the AB-not-A pattern, where AB is the constituent , 'know this CL man' consisting of , 'know' as A and , 'this CL man as B; A is likewise , 'know', in the second part of the construction. This produces , 'know this CL man not know'.= a-not-A form
= Example (7) illustrates the a-not-A pattern, where a is the first syllable, , of the disyllabic predicate , 'convenient', and A is the full predicate , and is 'con(venient)-not convenient'.= a-not-AB form
= Example (8) illustrates the a-not-AB pattern, where a is the first syllable, , of the disyllabic predicate , 'suitable', and AB is the constituent consisting of , 'suitable' as A and , 'teaching fist' as B, combining to form the AB constituent , 'suitable teaching fist'. This produces , 'suit(able)-not suitable teaching fist'.Grammatical particles used to form A-not-A questions
A-not-A can be formed by a verb, an adjective, or an adverb, as well as modals.=Verb
= In the interrogative clause, A-not-A occurs by repeating the first part in the verbal group (with the option of an=Adjective or adverb
= :A-NEG-A type: Here, the adjective , 'good', is A, and it is reduplicated. The word is a classifier, which means it is a counter word for the noun 'book'. (10.a) 这本书好不好? A: 好/不好 this CL book good not good good/not good DP A-NEG-A A/NEG A Is this book good? Yes/No :A-NEG type: Here, the adjective , 'good', is A, but it is not reduplicated. (10.b) 这本书好不? A: 好/不好 this CL book good not good/not good DP A-NEG A/NEG A Is this book good? Yes/No :Answers to (10.a), (10.b) must be in the form A or not-A.=Preposition
= :P-NEG-P type: Here, the preposition , 'at', is A, and it is reduplicated. (11.a) 张三在不在图书馆? A: 在/不在 Zhangsan at not at library at/not at DP P-NEG-P DP P/NEG P Is Zhangsan at the library? Yes/No :P-NEG-P type: Here, the preposition , 'at', is A, and it is not reduplicated. (11.b) 张三在图书馆不? A: 在/不在 Zhangsan at library not at/not at DP P-DP-NEG P/NEG P Is Zhangsan at the library? Yes/No :Answers to (11.a) and (11.b) must be in the form P or not-P.=Modal
= :M-NEG-M-V-Object type: Here, the modal is A and it is reduplicated. (12.a) 你敢不敢杀鸡? A: 敢/不敢 you dare not dare kill chicken dare/not dare N M-NEG-M -V -DP M/NEG M Do you dare kill chicken? Yes/No : The answer to (12.a) must be in the form M or not-M.A-not-A questions in Cantonese
Despite having the same negative marker as Mandarin, "不" ''bat1'' is only used inPatterns
= A-not-A form
= Like its Mandarin counterpart, this form is attested in Cantonese as shown by the sentence pair in (13), where in example (13.a), A is the verb , 'come', and is 'come not come', and in (13.b), A is the verb , 'come', and is 'come not come'.= AB-not-AB form
= As shown by (14.a), this is not an attested form in Cantonese, unlike the counterpart in Mandarin in (14.b). Here in (14.a) A is the verb , 'like', and B the noun , 'music', producing the AB form , 'like music'. This would produce the= A-not-AB form
= This form is only attested in Cantonese if the predicate is a monosyllabic word as shown by (15.a), where A is the verb , 'return', and AB is the constituent , 'return home'. This can be compared to the Mandarin counterpart in (15.b) where A is the verb , 'return', and AB is the constituent , 'return home. A-not-AB is not attested in Cantonese if the predicate is a bi-syllabic word as shown by (16.a), where A would be the verb , 'like', and AB would be the constituent , 'like music'. This contrasts with its Mandarin counterpart in (16.b), where A is the verb , 'like', and B is the complement , music', combining into the AB form , 'like music'. In such cases, Cantonese speakers usually use the form a-not-AB, like (8).= AB-not-A form
= This form is only attested in Cantonese if the predicate is a monosyllabic word A, exemplified in (17.a) with the verb , 'return', with an object B, exemplified in (17.a) with the noun , 'home'. (17.a) is shown below with its Mandarin counterpart in (17.b), where A is the verb , 'return', and B is the noun , 'home'. Note that such forms of AB-not-A in monosyllabic words are used by older generations. When the predicate is a bi-syllabic word, then AB-not-A form is not attested as shown in (18.a), unlike its Mandarin counterpart in (18.b).In Amoy
Negative markers in Amoy
The following negative markers are used. Alternate transliterations are shown in bold. (19) a. negative of volition (''m-1'') b. negative simplex (''m-2'') c. negative possessive/existential/affirmative aspect d. negative potential/possibility e. negative perfective aspect While ''m-1'' occurs as a free morpheme with its own semantic feature indicating volition, ''m-2'' cannot function by itself as a verb and works only to express negation. It is attested only with a limited amount of verbs.A-not-A constructions
Shown below are A-not-A constructions in Amoy.= With auxiliaries that can be used as main verbs
= The following is a list of A-not-A constructions in Amoy with auxiliary verbs which may function as the main verb of a sentence.: 'have — not have' The auxiliary verb here functions as an aspectual marker indicating that an action has been completed. In A-not-A constructions, functions as the first A, corresponding with the auxiliary 'have', while functions as the second A of the A-not-A construction, corresponding with the negative counterpart 'not have'. Example (20) illustrates the use of this construction.
: 'to have experienced — not to have experienced' The auxiliary verb functions as an aspectual marker indicating experience. In A-not-A constructions, functions as the first A, corresponding with an auxiliary expressing the sense of 'to have experienced', while functions as the second A of the A-not-A constructions, corresponding with the negative counterpart 'not to have experienced'. Example (21) illustrates the use of this construction.
: 'to be — not to be' The auxiliary verb works to express emphasis. In constructions A-not-A constructions, functions as the first A, roughly corresponding with 'to be', and as the second A, indicating the negative counterpart 'not to be'. Example (22) illustrates the use of this construction.
= With auxiliaries that cannot be used as main verbs
= The following is a list of A-not-A constructions in Amoy with auxiliary verbs which may never be used as the main verb of a sentence.: 'to want to — not to want to' The use of a construction is used to express an intention or an expectation. In these constructions, functions as the first A, indicating 'to want to', and as the second A, here working with to express its negative counterpart 'not want to.' Example (23) illustrates the use of this construction.
: 'must — must not' The use of a construction expresses a sense of obligation. In these constructions, functions as the first A, indicating 'must', and as the second A, here indicating the negative counterpart 'must not'. Example (24) illustrates the use of this construction.
: 'may — may not' The use of a construction expresses a sense of permission. In these constructions, functions as the first A, indicating 'may', and as the second A, here indicating the negative counterpart 'may not'. Example (25) illustrates the use of this construction.
: 'could — could not' The use of an construction expresses a sense of possibility or probability. In these constructions, functions as the first A, indicating 'could', and as the second A, here indicating the negative counterpart 'could not'. Example (26) illustrates the use of this construction.
: 'can, ability to do something — can't, inability to do something' The use of an construction expresses a sense of the ability to do something. In these constructions, functions as the first A, indicating 'can', and as the second A, here indicating the negative counterpart 'can't'. Example (27) illustrates the use of this construction as well as an instance of deletion from the negative predicate.
: 'could, can manage to or might — couldn't, couldn't manage or might not' The use of an construction expresses a sense of a potential ability to do something. In these constructions, functions as the first A, indicating 'could', and as the second A, here indicating the counterpart 'couldn't'. Example (28) illustrates the use of this construction as well as an instance of deletion from the negative predicate.
: 'to know how/be knowledgeable about — not to know how/be knowledgeable about' The use of an construction expresses a sense of one's knowledge. In these constructions, functions as the first A, indicating 'to know how', and as the second A, here indicating the negative counterpart 'not to know how'. Example (29) illustrates the use of this construction as well as an instance of deletion from the negative predicate.
In Korean
The following are examples of A-not-A questions inPre-predicate negation
Both and can precede the predicate in A-not-A questions.Example (26) illustrates the use of , short form for , which expresses simple negation. Here A is , 'sleep-COMP', and is 'sleep-COMP not sleep-COMP'.
Example (27) illustrates the use of , which expresses impossibility or inability. Here A is , 'go-PAST-COMP' and is 'go-PAST-COMP cannot go-PAST-COMP'.
Inherently-negative predicate
Korean has three negative predicates that can form A-not-A question, , , and .Example (28) illustrates the use of , which means 'don't know'.
Example (29) illustrates the use of , which means 'do not have; do not exist'.
Example (30) illustrates the use of , which means 'is not'.
Negative modal auxiliary
Meaning 'desist from', follows an affirmative polar question, and will occur instead of a reduplicated full verb that has a post predicate negation, meaning that there is only one full verb in this type of A-not-A question. However, the modal auxiliary verb is restricted in that it does not co-occur in predicative adjectives or the factual
Analysis: The post-syntactic approach
One analysis of the formation of the A-not-A construction is the post-syntactic approach, through two stages of M-merger. First, the A-not-A operator targets theConditional criteria for grammatical A-not-A question derivation
A-not-A operator lowering
The A-not-A operator is defined as an MWd. The A-not-A operator can only lower to a MWd which is immediately dominated by theReduplication of first syllable of adjacent morphosyntactic word
In first syllable reduplication, the A-not-A operator copies the first syllable of the adjacent MWd and moves the reduplicant, i.e. copied syllable, to the left of the base MWd. Then the negation is inserted between the reduplicant and base to form a grammatical sentence. In (33.a), the A-not-A operator copies the first syllable of the MWd . The reduplicant is put at the left of the base and then the negative constituent is inserted in between. In figure (33.b) is ungrammatical because cannot be put to the right of the maximal projection VP, .Reduplication of adjacent morphosyntactic word
In MWd reduplication, the A-not-A operator copies the adjacent MWd and moves the reduplicant MWd overtly to the left of the base MWd or to right of the base maximal projection containing the MWd. Otherwise, the reduplicant can move covertly, i.e. in such a way that there is no overt surface evidence, to the right of the base maximal projection containing the MWd. The negation is then inserted between the reduplicant and base to form a grammatical sentence. In (34.a) the A-not-A operator copies the MWd . The reduplicant is overtly put at the left of the base and then the negative constituent is inserted in between. In (34.b) the A-not-A operator copies the MWd . The reduplicant is overtly put at the right of the base and then the negative constituent is inserted in between. In (34.c) the A-not-A operator copies the MWd . The reduplicant is covertly put at the right of the base after which the negative constituent is inserted.Reduplication of the maximal projection containing adjacent morphosyntactic word
In maximal projection reduplication, the A-not-A operator copies the maximal projection that contains the adjacent MWd and moves the reduplicant either to the left or to the right of the base. The base may be just the MWd or the maximal projection containing the MWd. The maximal projection may be any XP (VP, AP, PP etc.). The negation is then inserted between the reduplicant and base to form a grammatical sentence. In (35) the A-not-A operator copies the maximal projection VP . The reduplicant is put at the left of the base and then the negative constituent is inserted in between.See also
*References
{{reflist Human communication Grammar Syntax Semantics Types of question