|
Dependent Choice
In mathematics, the axiom of dependent choice, denoted by \mathsf , is a weak form of the axiom of choice ( \mathsf ) that is still sufficient to develop most of real analysis. It was introduced by Paul Bernays in a 1942 article that explores which set-theoretic axioms are needed to develop analysis."The foundation of analysis does not require the full generality of set theory but can be accomplished within a more restricted frame." The axiom of dependent choice is stated on p. 86. Formal statement A homogeneous relation R on X is called a total relation if for every a \in X, there exists some b \in X such that a\,R~b is true. The axiom of dependent choice can be stated as follows: For every nonempty set X and every total relation R on X, there exists a sequence (x_n)_ in X such that :x_n\, R~x_ for all n \in \N. ''x''0 may be taken to be any desired element of ''X''. If the set X above is restricted to be the set of all real numbers, then the resulting axiom is denot ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Mathematics
Mathematics is an area of knowledge that includes the topics of numbers, formulas and related structures, shapes and the spaces in which they are contained, and quantities and their changes. These topics are represented in modern mathematics with the major subdisciplines of number theory, algebra, geometry, and analysis, respectively. There is no general consensus among mathematicians about a common definition for their academic discipline. Most mathematical activity involves the discovery of properties of abstract objects and the use of pure reason to prove them. These objects consist of either abstractions from nature orin modern mathematicsentities that are stipulated to have certain properties, called axioms. A ''proof'' consists of a succession of applications of deductive rules to already established results. These results include previously proved theorems, axioms, andin case of abstraction from naturesome basic properties that are considered true starting points of t ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Baire Category Theorem
The Baire category theorem (BCT) is an important result in general topology and functional analysis. The theorem has two forms, each of which gives sufficient conditions for a topological space to be a Baire space (a topological space such that the intersection of countably many dense open sets is still dense). It is used in the proof of results in many areas of analysis and geometry, including some of the fundamental theorems of functional analysis. Versions of the Baire category theorem were first proved independently in 1897 by Osgood for the real line \R and in 1899 by Baire for Euclidean space \R^n. Statement A Baire space is a topological space X in which every countable intersection of open dense sets is dense in X. See the corresponding article for a list of equivalent characterizations, as some are more useful than others depending on the application. * (BCT1) Every complete pseudometric space is a Baire space. In particular, every completely metrizable topological ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Axiom Of Countable Choice
The axiom of countable choice or axiom of denumerable choice, denoted ACω, is an axiom of set theory that states that every countable collection of non-empty sets must have a choice function. That is, given a function ''A'' with domain N (where N denotes the set of natural numbers) such that ''A''(''n'') is a non-empty set for every ''n'' ∈ N, there exists a function ''f'' with domain N such that ''f''(''n'') ∈ ''A''(''n'') for every ''n'' ∈ N. Overview The axiom of countable choice (ACω) is strictly weaker than the axiom of dependent choice (DC), which in turn is weaker than the axiom of choice (AC). Paul Cohen showed that ACω is not provable in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (ZF) without the axiom of choice . ACω holds in the Solovay model. ZF+ACω suffices to prove that the union of countably many countable sets is countable. It also suffices to prove that every infinite set is Dedekind-infinite (equivalently: has a countably infinite ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Solovay Model
In the mathematical field of set theory, the Solovay model is a model constructed by in which all of the axioms of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (ZF) hold, exclusive of the axiom of choice, but in which all sets of real numbers are Lebesgue measurable. The construction relies on the existence of an inaccessible cardinal. In this way Solovay showed that the axiom of choice is essential to the proof of the existence of a non-measurable set, at least granted that the existence of an inaccessible cardinal is consistent with ZFC, the axioms of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory including the axiom of choice. Statement ZF stands for Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, and DC for the axiom of dependent choice. Solovay's theorem is as follows. Assuming the existence of an inaccessible cardinal, there is an inner model of ZF + DC of a suitable forcing extension ''V'' 'G''such that every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable, has the perfect set property, and has the Baire property. Constructio ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Perfect Set Property
In descriptive set theory, a subset of a Polish space has the perfect set property if it is either countable or has a nonempty perfect subset (Kechris 1995, p. 150). Note that having the perfect set property is not the same as being a perfect set. As nonempty perfect sets in a Polish space always have the cardinality of the continuum, and the reals form a Polish space, a set of reals with the perfect set property cannot be a counterexample to the continuum hypothesis, stated in the form that every uncountable set of reals has the cardinality of the continuum. The Cantor–Bendixson theorem states that closed sets of a Polish space ''X'' have the perfect set property in a particularly strong form: any closed subset of ''X'' may be written uniquely as the disjoint union of a perfect set and a countable set. In particular, every uncountable Polish space has the perfect set property, and can be written as the disjoint union of a perfect set and a countable open set. The a ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Property Of Baire
A subset A of a topological space X has the property of Baire (Baire property, named after René-Louis Baire), or is called an almost open set, if it differs from an open set by a meager set; that is, if there is an open set U\subseteq X such that A \bigtriangleup U is meager (where \bigtriangleup denotes the symmetric difference).. Definitions A subset A \subseteq X of a topological space X is called almost open and is said to have the property of Baire or the Baire property if there is an open set U\subseteq X such that A \bigtriangleup U is a meager subset, where \bigtriangleup denotes the symmetric difference. Further, A has the Baire property in the restricted sense if for every subset E of X the intersection A\cap E has the Baire property relative to E. Properties The family of sets with the property of Baire forms a σ-algebra. That is, the complement of an almost open set is almost open, and any countable union or intersection of almost open sets is again almos ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Nonmeasurable
In mathematics, a non-measurable set is a set which cannot be assigned a meaningful "volume". The mathematical existence of such sets is construed to provide information about the notions of length, area and volume in formal set theory. In Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, the axiom of choice entails that non-measurable subsets of \mathbb exist. The notion of a non-measurable set has been a source of great controversy since its introduction. Historically, this led Borel and Kolmogorov to formulate probability theory on sets which are constrained to be measurable. The measurable sets on the line are iterated countable unions and intersections of intervals (called Borel sets) plus-minus null sets. These sets are rich enough to include every conceivable definition of a set that arises in standard mathematics, but they require a lot of formalism to prove that sets are measurable. In 1970, Robert M. Solovay constructed the Solovay model, which shows that it is consistent with stan ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Strictly Increasing
In mathematics, a monotonic function (or monotone function) is a function between ordered sets that preserves or reverses the given order. This concept first arose in calculus, and was later generalized to the more abstract setting of order theory. In calculus and analysis In calculus, a function f defined on a subset of the real numbers with real values is called ''monotonic'' if and only if it is either entirely non-increasing, or entirely non-decreasing. That is, as per Fig. 1, a function that increases monotonically does not exclusively have to increase, it simply must not decrease. A function is called ''monotonically increasing'' (also ''increasing'' or ''non-decreasing'') if for all x and y such that x \leq y one has f\!\left(x\right) \leq f\!\left(y\right), so f preserves the order (see Figure 1). Likewise, a function is called ''monotonically decreasing'' (also ''decreasing'' or ''non-increasing'') if, whenever x \leq y, then f\!\left(x\right) \geq f\!\left(y\ ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin
The ''Canadian Mathematical Bulletin'' (french: Bulletin Canadien de Mathématiques) is a mathematics journal, established in 1958 and published quarterly by the Canadian Mathematical Society. The current editors-in-chief of the journal are Antonio Lei and Javad Mashreghi. The journal publishes short articles in all areas of mathematics that are of sufficient interest to the general mathematical public. Abstracting and indexing The journal is abstracted in: for the Canadian Mathematical Bulletin. * '''' * '' [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Branch (descriptive Set Theory)
In descriptive set theory, a tree on a set X is a collection of finite sequences of elements of X such that every prefix of a sequence in the collection also belongs to the collection. Definitions Trees The collection of all finite sequences of elements of a set X is denoted X^. With this notation, a tree is a nonempty subset T of X^, such that if \langle x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_\rangle is a sequence of length n in T, and if 0\le m and called the ''body'' of the tree T. A tree that has no branches is called ''wellfounded''; a tree with at least one branch is ''illfounded''. By Kőnig's lemma, a tree on a finite set with an infinite number of sequences must necessarily be illfounded. Terminal nodes A finite sequence that belongs to a tree T is called a terminal node if it is not a prefix of a longer sequence in T. Equivalently, \langle x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_\rangle \in T is terminal if there is no element x of X such that that \langle x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_,x\rangle \in T. A tree that does not ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Pruned Tree
In descriptive set theory, a tree on a set X is a collection of finite sequences of elements of X such that every prefix of a sequence in the collection also belongs to the collection. Definitions Trees The collection of all finite sequences of elements of a set X is denoted X^. With this notation, a tree is a nonempty subset T of X^, such that if \langle x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_\rangle is a sequence of length n in T, and if 0\le m and called the ''body'' of the tree T. A tree that has no branches is called '' wellfounded''; a tree with at least one branch is ''illfounded''. By Kőnig's lemma, a tree on a finite set with an infinite number of sequences must necessarily be illfounded. Terminal nodes A finite sequence that belongs to a tree T is called a terminal node if it is not a prefix of a longer sequence in T. Equivalently, \langle x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_\rangle \in T is terminal if there is no element x of X such that that \langle x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_,x\rangle \in T. A tree that does no ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
